In,
1 Timothy 2:9 it states that a
woman should dress modestly and without fancy clothing or jewelry. The woman should be humble in her appearance
and attitude. I believe Thecla did follow this message. It never mentions
whether Thecla dressed in lavish clothing before she heard Paul speak, however,
we do know she had planned to marry. In the story of Paul and Thecla it
mentions that marriage was about riches and lifestyle, therefore, we can imply
that she was not fully living the lifestyle 1 Timothy 2:9 describes for a
woman. Although, when she set out to find Paul she dressed in simple clothing as
to not attract attention. She did not want to dress in lavish clothing, her
only concern was to find Paul and begin spreading the word of God.
In 1
Timothy 2:11 a woman is encouraged to learn in full submission, which Thecla
did when she listened to Paul. Her fiancé and mother were very displeased,
because Thecla would not speak to them or move away from the window. She was
immersed with what Paul was teaching and wanted to learn. Then, 1 Timothy 2:12
describes how no woman is suppose to teach or have authority over men. Paul
actually tells Thecla to go and teach the word of God. He does so without
mentioning whether she should teach to just women, just men, or both. I have
interpreted that Paul wanted her to teach to both men and women even though
that is contradicting with what 1 Timothy 2:12 says. The story of Paul and
Thecla does describe Thecla teaching to women, but the story was never clear as
to whether or not Thecla taught men too. I believe Thecla did conform to what 1
Timothy 2:1-15 says is right.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou have some great points and the essay is interesting to read because I had thought the complete opposite. The essay is good for me to see how each of us can interpret the text differently from different backgrounds and coming from diverse backgrounds. I agree that Thecla had full submission towards Paul, but what about having submission to people close to her, like her mom and her fiancé? In the end, the essay starts to argue that Thecla did not conform to 1 Timothy 2:12 due to teaching the Word. In other words, does Thecla truly conform with 1 Timothy's understanding of women?
ReplyDeleteYou made same good points but I do also agree that Thecla violated the submission principle in regards to her husband. I believe that principle mostly applies to a woman's husband or male guardian. I also think that your essay needs a bit more of a conclusion or sense of closure since it feels like the ending was abrupt.
ReplyDeleteRachel Robinson