Thecla the Troublemaker
1 Timothy 2,
particularly lines 8-15, speak of proper conduct within the church.
While that is all well and good, it goes strangely in depth about the
ways that women must conduct themselves. While men receive simple
instructions of “pray,
lifting
up holy hands without anger or argument” (1Tim 2:8”), women had a
veritable laundry list of tasks to perform. 1 Timothy 9 outlined
proper women's fashion, but it is 1 Timothy 12 that would have a
modern-day feminist prepare a lawsuit, “I permit no woman to teach
or have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.” But why does
the Bible require such insistent instructions for women? Were they
not already properly behaved women who respected and honored their
husbands; knowing that through childbirth, her sins would be
forgiven? Joanna Dewey suggests in the Women's
Bible Commentary
that these verse were actually written to counteract the changing
social structure of women in post-Pauline Christianity. While it is a
known work of fiction, the Acts
of Paul and Thecla
demonstrates the heightened role granted to women in Paul's era,
which drove the need for 2nd
century Christians to alter.
Thecla
was a virgin. She was betrothed to a man named Thamyris, which was
encouraged heavily by her mother Theocleia. Thecla, however, was not
content with the lifestyle that laid before her and instead was
enamored by the teachings of Paul who had come to the city to teach
the word of Christ. Even when Paul was imprisoned for his teachings,
Thecla snuck into the prison to continue learning how she could be
saved. Even when she was set upon a pyre to be burned, she remained
steadfast in her new belief and was rewarded for it. When she meets
again with Paul, she offers to discard a symbol of her womanhood, “I
will cut my hair short (Acts of Paul, 25)”. They come to the city
of Antioch, where a man named Alexander falls in love with her. He
embraces her openly but she invokes the name of God and rips off the
man's cloak, publicly shaming him. (Acts of Paul, 26). 1 Timothy 2
would most certainly not approve of such a spectacle, violating the
laws of remaining silent as well as expressing authority over a man
(1 Tim 2:12).
In
retaliation for her defiance against him, Alexander has her pitted
against beasts, but again she comes out unscathed. The crowd that
witnessed her miracles gathered to her and sought to learn from her.
Rather than rebuking them from seeking teaching from a woman, she
leads them, using them to help her locate Paul. When the two reunite,
Paul does not chastise her for spreading the teachings like 1 Tim
2:12 disapproves of, but in fact, tells her, “Go and teach the word
of God! (Acts of Paul, 41)” Clearly, Paul did not know what he was
doing. He was teaching Christianity poorly and leading down people
down the wrong path. That's why when the churches had to make some
corrections to the letters of Paul in the second century to ensure
the woman would not follow Thecla's example.
I agree with your perspective of the difference between the devout and saintly Thecla's behavior and that recommended by Timothy. I imagine many women were affected by Thecla's public spiritual experiences, and this was a threat to the status quo at the time.
ReplyDeleteI am thankful that we now live in a time when women's voices are being heard again, even though there are many who would much prefer that to not be the case at all.