Amy Smith
WGS 3464/5960
Essay/Blog 5
First Timothy 2:1-15 outlines
acceptable behavior for second century Christians in the context of the church,
the home, and also in wider society. Beginning
in verse 9, the author of the book, speaking with the authority of Paul,
prescribes conduct for women which is much more narrow in scope than previously
asserted by Paul in the first century.
In this passage (and subsequent verses), women are instructed to model
their Christian faith in outward appearances of modesty, reverence, and silence
in the presence of men (1 Tim. 2:9-12).
One of the most important declarations of 1 Timothy 2 regarding women is
found in verse 15, in which the author argues women are saved through the act
of childbearing. In this verse, the
author situates women’s salvation in the home, though the traditional cultural
roles of wife and mother. It is here
that the character of Thecla, in the Acts of Paul and Thecla, demonstrates a
wide divergence in theological doctrine, as Thecla completely rejects the traditional
model of womanhood presented in First Timothy.
In the Acts of Paul and Thecla,
Thecla becomes a fanatical follower of Paul, and severs ties with virtually all
aspects of her former life. In
paragraphs 5-7, Thecla listens carefully to the Beatitudes of Paul, and takes
to heart the statement that virgin bodies are blessed (and perhaps preferred?),
and this physical purity will be rewarded by God. Later, Thecla is so entranced by Paul’s
message, she does not even respond to her fiancĂ©’s presence and direct
questions (Acts of Paul, 10). As a
result, Thecla’s household reacts as if she is dead, and rituals of mourning
occur (10). Her rejection of the proper
female role of wife and mother is tantamount to death in the culture, and this
reaction would reflect the social conventions promoted by the author of First
Timothy. Ideologically, Thecla and the author of First
Timothy are diametrically opposed, as McGinn argues, “In the apocalyptic
perspective of the Acts of Thecla, moral purity (which in this case includes
sexual abstinence) becomes grounds for salvation” (McGinn, 808). Not only do Thecla’s actions not conform to
proper standards for women’s behavior described in First Timothy, the
fundamental methodology of achieving salvation is in conflict. Interestingly, both First Timothy and the
Acts of Paul and Thecla are based on the authority of the teachings of
Paul.
McGinn, Sheila, E. “The Acts of Thecla”, Searching the Scriptures Volume Two: A Feminist Commentary, Elisabeth
Schussler Fiorenza, ed., Crossroad, 1993.
The essay, even though short, should open with a introduction paragraph. Even if it's only a few sentences long, it helps set up the reader for the points you are going to make. Otherwise, the essay flows smoothly. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that a huge difference between Timothy and Paul is that Timothy says women are saved through child bearing where as Paul promotes celibacy. I also like that you pointed out that Thelca rejection of the proper female role rejects what Timothy also says. I agree that Timothy and Paul’s version of the way women should act are very different. I think you had a very strong essay and I enjoyed reading it, very good job!
ReplyDeleteI would have to agree with Heather, the two passages show women differently, one showed her consequences of rejecting her marriage by following Paul. The other showed her being saved through her devotion. You wrote a good essay here and you made strong points. Great job
ReplyDelete