Amy Smith
WGS 3464/5960
Essay/Blog 3
The characters of Esther and Judith
both represent unconventional female behavior in the context of Abrahamic
traditions. Given the patriarchal
backdrop in which both narratives exist, the actions of Esther and Judith are
extraordinary. Both characters are
assertive and each shows personal agency.
Each woman comes to an elevated position in their communities by their
spouse. Esther achieves status because
she becomes queen by the rather emotional command of the king (Esther 2:1-18),
and Judith is left with great wealth upon the death of her husband (Judith
8:2-8). Both women take enormous risks
to their own well being by saving the lives of the people of Israel (Esther
8:1-16), (Judith, chapters 10-13).
However, Esther employs more subtle methods (and less violent) in
dealing with the king to achieve her goal of saving the Jews from destruction. As Crawford argues, Esther “…uses her
knowledge of the king’s character to attain her goal by appealing to his
emotions” (Crawford, 206). Esther uses
hospitality and comfort, in the form of banquets, to appease the king and lull
Haman into a false sense of security (Esther 5:1-7).
Judith’s methods to save Israel
from slavery are more explicit when she offers herself for sex with Holofernes,
and beheads him when he is very drunk (Judith 12:10-20; 13:1-9). Judith is portrayed as a warrior in her
violent act. Both Judith and Esther rely
on their beauty and femininity to gain literal and figurative access to the
powerful men in their lives (Esther 5:1, Judith 12:14). Only in the Additions to Esther is Esther portrayed
with any religious characteristics, as her prayer rituals are preparation for
her future actions to save the Jews (Additions to Esther 14). Judith also engages in prayer rituals to
prepare herself to meet and kill Holofernes (Judith 9). In these passages, both women call on the
power of God for help and intervention to stop the potential end of their
cultures.
Judith appears to be less dependent
on men for her authority, and when she speaks to the elders in 8:9-35, she
almost appears to be a man, or possess leadership qualities. The elders accept her criticisms and do not
seem to acknowledge any male/female hierarchies that existed in this
society. Judith’s traditional female
role is ignored by the elders in this passage.
In contrast, Esther role in the Additions is placed firmly within
traditional hierarchies of the time. Her
contributions to ending the Jewish genocide become secondary to those of
Mordecai, who becomes more of the focal point of the story (Additions 11,
13). Religiosity in the Additions places
Esther in a supportive, traditional female role, but although religion plays a
significant part in the story of Judith, Judith status of woman does not
marginalize her.
Crawford, Sidnie White, “Esther”, Women’s Bible Commentary, Carol A.
Newsom, Sharon H. Ringe and Jacqueline E. Lapsley, eds., Westminster John Knox
Press, 2012, pp. 201-207.
Hi, Amy. I enjoyed reading how you interpreted Esther and Judith in light of one another, and I agree with almost everything you say. I think your description of Esther's methods as "subtle" is spot on. She definitely seemed to be using the tools she had available, unlike Judith, who simply took full command over the situation, so to speak. It's also interesting that you mention the way the elders of the village reacted to Judith's leadership and that there was nothing really mentioned by them of her gender and position. I didn't even think about this, but it is very interesting that they seemed to react to her as they might a man! Regarding Mordecai becoming the focus of the Additions to Esther—yes, I agree completely. Esther's power definitely seemed to be undermined with the Additions, and I think it would be really interesting to learn more about the motivations for altering the Book of Esther in this way. Anyway, great job on your essay!
ReplyDelete