Friday, January 17, 2014

I Can't Dance (Eschbach)



Genesis does not begin with much of either gender, it’s not until the end of Genesis 1:1-2:3 that we first hear of the creation of people, “God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” Aside from males being mentioned first, there is no true division of gender. And someone had to be mentioned first, any attention being brought to the order is over analyzing. God gives the male and female instructions to, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.” (Gen 1:28). No special instructions are given to the male over the female (or vice-versa). In the beginning of Genesis the genders are standing on equal footing.
                In Genesis 2:4-24 things take a different turn for the genders. The origin of man becomes first with “then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being.” (Gen 2:7). There is no mention of a female presence for a while.  God tries to pair man with every living creature before reaching into his/her infinite wisdom to make a more equal counterpart. The Women’s Bible Commentary sums it up perfectly with “the creation of other living beings (2:18) is motivated by God’s concern that ‘it is not good that the man should be alone’” (Newsom & Ringe). In order to create woman, “he took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh” (Gen 2:21). The use of something being taken from the man not only emphasizes that woman’s creation would not be possible without man, but that man is quite literally giving up a piece of himself to create woman.
            Additionally, Genesis 1:1-2:3 highlights division in the creation myth. With each of the "And God said" passages things are created in pairs - in divisions. Yet each thing God previously created was granted to "them." They were a pair and were given the world as such.

1 comment:

  1. They do seem as equal status in Genesis 1:1-2:3, but previous verses indicate that they are opposites. Therefore, maybe they were made for different purposes. It is interesting that it does not specify their differences as previous verses did with everything else made. Then, in Genesis 2:4-24 it is surprising that there is not too much mention of the creations and their opposites. It more focuses on the how the male and female were created.

    ReplyDelete